Another episode of “Thinking of Eavesdropping? Don’t Do It!”
PIERRE, S.D. (KELO) — The South Dakota Supreme Court says an invasion of privacy claim shouldn’t have been dismissed in favor of the defendants involving recordings that a wife secretly made to use against her husband in a divorce case.
Justice Janine Kern wrote the unanimous decision in Gantvoort v. Ranschau that the state’s high court released Thursday.
Doug Gantvoort sued his former wife, Mary Ranschau, and her attorney, David Strait, after Mary hid a recording device in the office that Gantvoort used at their Clear Lake business and where he sometimes spent nights.
From the court details:
Doug Gantvoort (Doug) sued his former wife, Mary Ranschau (Mary), and her attorney, David Strait (Strait), after Mary placed a hidden recording device in Doug’s office during their tumultuous divorce. Strait accepted fifty-one recordings that Mary made of Doug, saved them onto his computers, and attempted […]